On Jul 27, 2010, at 12:25 PM, Mike Grant wrote: > I just got > an email back where they say the issue is that they've used 5 longs > rather than 7 in the "Number of points by return" field. If they're > correct, that might throw off later values in the header / mess up > reading compliant LAS 1.3 files.
aha! That would explain why I could read it. I wasn't accounting for them changing the size of that array from 1.2 -> 1.3. (that sucks, btw). Your file is properly broken now :) Howard _______________________________________________ Liblas-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/liblas-devel
