Me as well. Derek
On Apr 3, 2009, at 3:52 PM, Kirk, Benjamin (JSC-EG311) wrote: > I vote for default... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Roy Stogner <[email protected]> > To: Derek Gaston <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] <[email protected] > > > Sent: Fri Apr 03 16:21:33 2009 > Subject: Re: [Libmesh-users] Second Derivatives > > > On Fri, 3 Apr 2009, Derek Gaston wrote: > >> So as long as you request _something_ before doing reinit() you >> should >> be ok? > > That's exactly right. I wanted to optimize FE::reinit() (which > includes some of the most significant inefficiencies in the library > for some of my problems) as much as possible, but I didn't want to > break anyone's existing code. So in case someone does a reinit() > after asking for *nothing*, I assume that we should be prepared for > them later asking for *anything*. > >> I think that works for us... we always request _something_ of >> our FE objects. > > So do most people, I think. Perhaps --enable-second should now be on > by default, or at least should be part of --enable-everything? > --- > Roy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > Libmesh-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
