On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Karen Lee wrote:
> Thanks! Looks like I was just missing some entries of my MeshData since I was > combining 2 node files... Oh, but one more suggestion: if you can avoid using MeshData, do so. It doesn't work with more than one MPI rank, it hasn't been tested with threads, and since it hasn't had an active developer in years I'd be wary of it in serial as well. The trouble is that our developers have gotten in the habit of (and in some cases express strong reasons for preferring) using ExplicitSystem solutions to store function data and using subdomain ids to index into tables of discrete data. You seem to be running problems large enough that parallelizing them will be beneficial, and it might be an obstacle if you find yourself having to rewrite the MeshData class before you could run in parallel. --- Roy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Libmesh-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libmesh-users
