I'm visiting my friends Ralph & Kathy.  The Fucetolas have been known in
libertarian circles from way back (see mentions in "It Usually Begins With
Ayn Rand" and "Alongside Night"), and Ralph currently offers legal advice
to people in the dietary supplements biz -- http://vitaminlawyer.com . 
Last night we were discussing CAFTA and I was telling them I thought their
analysis and that of others in the movement on this subject was wrong.  As
I pointed out here, the measures in question provide that no product can be
kept out of trade between signatory nations if it would be allowed in
commerce according to the domestic (i.e. internal) regs of the importing
country, and CAFTA adopts Codex Alimentarius (the international food code)
in that no country may have stricter regs than it poses.  Looks like it's
pro-freedom to me.

Ralph & Kathy countered to the effect that this is an example wherein a
ceiling of regs becomes a floor.  They say that the practical effect is to
have countries adopt Codex even where it's STRICTER than their current regs
(resulting in limits on vitamin dosage units, in some cases making
supplements into ethical drugs), even though no signatory country is bound
to do so.  They also say that the big companies have already limited their
products in response to Codex, and that the smaller companies won't be able
to beat them out by reintroducing such products because insurance companies
won't issue liability policies for products that don't conform, even though
no law requires them to do so.

So what are we to think?  Can anyone think of other examples wherein the
application of a gov't measure is supposed to limit regulations and
increase choices, but wherein the voluntary actions of either signatory
nations or private businesses in response is to act as if certain new regs
were coming come into force?

In Your Sly Tribe,
Robert
_______________________________________________
Libnw mailing list
Libnw@immosys.com
List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw
Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw

Reply via email to