Frank Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Any thoughts on strategies to pursue from here?
>I don't know what others on this list might honestly prefer. >That is, you just gave me at least three clicks to understand the >context of something you asked me, and everyone else, to comment on. >I'm just thinking, it might be better time served, if you take a >moment and write it up in short context, in your own words, and >then give the sites as references to your position. I don't HAVE a position! That's why I was soliciting reactions. >Liberty Northwest has always been a dialogue channel. It's >difficult, as I see it anyway, when web sites show up without any >real introduction, or context, and then ask for followup >commentary. I really don't have any interest in clicking on any >of them unless you first tell me why this is important in the >context of discussing Liberty in terms of Education. I've, for >one, chosen not to follow this any further since it is 12:17 p.m. >tonight. We have so little traffic, I thought some readers might take the time. >Again, I might be wrong, and others here might disagree with me, >but I have this strong aversion to clicking on things without >knowing first why at least a preliminary informatory explation >might be in order first as to why this might be important to follow. >Help me out here Robert. OK. The top ct. of Fla. struck down one of the state's school voucher programs on the basis of Fla's constitution's providing for a "uniform" system of schools. I selected 3 articles on the subject for their complementarity of background info, including others' reactions. I hear there are some other states that have the uniformity requirement in their constitutions. In Your Sly Tribe, Robert _______________________________________________ Libnw mailing list Libnw@immosys.com List info and subscriber options: http://immosys.com/mailman/listinfo/libnw Archives: http://immosys.com/mailman//pipermail/libnw
