Please not another branch, it will be hard enough to sync the existing branches. I do not think that there is such a big bug in r2004 decoding (the existing segfault can be fixed with the correct struct alignment!).
Why force a release? Are there any benefits? To get closer to a release this should be fixed: - memory management - object management (store the objects in a rb-tree or a hash map) You are very welcome to join libredwg again! I think about joining you. Am 02.08.2013 um 18:51 schrieb Avneet Kaur <[email protected]>: > On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:09 PM, Felipe Castro <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> My suggestion is a new branch getting rid of the R2004 stuff for now, and >> release the working stuff "early". > > If you think it's better to make a separate branch for R2004, then I will do. > >> Do you think I could merge your code and do it now, while you finish your >> refactoring, or is it good to wait for more >> of your work? > > It's upto you. I have no objection, If you use my work to release > future versions of library. > Infact, I would be very glad to see my work done in coming versions. > But still I request you to check/test in case of any bug, so that > newer version of our library could be as much usable as > possible. > >> I'll go throught it, and then I make pertinent (or not, tell me) >> suggestions, if any, ok? > > Yeah, sure. > > -- > Er. Avneet Kaur > Blog: www.avneetkhasla.wordpress.com > > "Coming together is a beginning; keeping together is progress; working > together is success." >
