2013/8/2 Till Heuschmann <[email protected]> > > Please not another branch, it will be hard enough to sync the existing > branches. I do not think that there is such a big bug in r2004 decoding > (the existing segfault can be fixed with the correct struct alignment!). >
Ok, if not a big deal, better to keep it together. But it do not hurt to isolate the problem for a first release, what about compiling switches? > > Why force a release? Are there any benefits? > Yes, a tar ball is a good thing: some stable stuff to deal with. None may use a library which "never" get released. What's the problem to get an alpha release? > To get closer to a release this should be fixed: > - memory management > Yes, I agree, and I may try to help. - object management (store the objects in a rb-tree or a hash map) > This is more like an API task, no? > You are very welcome to join libredwg again! I think about joining you. > Ok, nice, could you point what task could be done in parallel with the GSoC branches for now? I'm still lost, maybe I need just keep on understanding the code, ok?
