https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165690
--- Comment #10 from Dave Gilbert <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #9) > (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #4) > (In reply to Dave Gilbert from comment #8) > > It is a question of reputation and UX, managing user expectation. > > I do it because the other side of the issue is UX complaint that PDF they've > "edited" (i.e. opened into Draw) has been corrupted when they overwrite it, > or worse completely lost! > > So if we tell folks they can edit PDF with LibreOffice, they expect they'll > have something at the end of their workflow that resembles their source PDF. > > We can not, so suggesting that LibreOffice can edit their PDFs is just wrong. That's why I suggested the 'is still a bit limited' - it gives a balance of expectations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
