https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171969
ady <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |olivier.hallot@libreoffice. | |org --- Comment #6 from ady <[email protected]> --- (In reply to gmolleda from comment #5) > Microsoft's own documentation is much clearer on this point. It explicitly > states that DATEDIF is retained for compatibility with old Lotus 1-2-3 > workbooks, and specifically warns that the "MD" argument may produce a > negative number, zero, or an inaccurate result > If LibreOffice intentionally reproduces that behaviour for interoperability, > I think Calc Help should document the same limitation. CC'ing Olivier for possibly improving Help content regarding the DATEDIF function. Please see TDF wiki (too) for the DATEDIF function; which already includes the note: "This function is included for backward compatibility. In some cases, this function might return incorrect results. Use alternative functions instead; see #Examples:." -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
