https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75683
--- Comment #41 from Alex <alup...@gmail.com> --- Alex: Comments on Michael's Comment 39 > either you dive in the code and propose a fix or you can pay/ask politely > someone to do it. Hi Michael, Hope the "you" above is the generic one (i.e., = "one") and not me (Alex) since I did say (pretty politely:) "PLEASE assign a professional ..." :) That little detail out of the way, > Did you give a try to a Live Ubuntu 32 to be sure it's a 32/64 bits problem? > Because to summarize, we could say too it works on Ubuntu and not on BLFS. No. My Ubuntu is 64. But > To be more specific, I consider .deb and .rpm available > on official website for distrib packagers not for a casual user. These are just asides: I think a "casual" person who set up a complete system by analyzing, compiling from sources, ETC. can at times impersonate a packager:) Anyway, as I said, I also tested (successfully) compiled sources (with practically same 'autogen.input') on either system. AAMOF, I ended up with an Ubuntu (14.04) 64 bits after the urgings from a Google developer kinda warning me that if I stayed too much longer on 32, I may run (with Chromium compile/_link_) into some life-threatening limitation on the 4G "wall" (my hardware having been blessed with 16G physical all along). So like any _casual_ user (any butcher's, baker's and/or candlestick maker's son, to put it more explicitly) after an hour or so, I could safely yell, "look world, no 32 bits!" :-). More seriously, I can now compare compiling Chromium on a 32 with on a 64 (not such a dramatic difference - 60 min. vs 47 min., on my relatively fast machine). While we're here, we can now (finally:) get into > any hint which could help here? our LO subject bug: with all the trimmings, the source 'make build' takes about 95 min. on 32 (BLFS) and 65 min. on 64 (Ubuntu). So there. Hint #1 (other than the stuff supplied long ago, as Comment #37) Please (politely:) revisit Bug 725417 <bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725417> Hint #2 Please go over Bug 84154 <bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84154> Hint #3 Reminder, all my latest tests (summarized in my previous comment) strictly compare watermelons to watermelons: - Binary (.deb) same-version LO binaries. - Compiled sources of same version LO (latest git as of Oct. 7 - can be any "official" source version release for that matter, if need arises) Hint #4 Nobody from LO has ever stated their "position" publicly as to how LO handles sound (Gstreamer, which versions, which plug-ins, or maybe, something entirely different). That "disclosure" might help a non-casual user in figuring out how the problem is created/occurs and maybe, who knows, avoid all these headaches for all involved. Thank you for your interest, -- Alex PS I was adding this comment while you were adding yours. Hope is still makes the same sense. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
