https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
--- Comment #44 from Markus Wernig <pub...@wernig.net> --- (In reply to Tor Lillqvist from comment #40) > Well, it can be a matter of taste what is "correctly signed" and what is > not. Presumably many "normal" users use the latest version of Adobe Reader, > and it claims the signature is invalid. (Even if nothing else is invalid, > the certificate used for signing is both expired (expired 2013-12-27) and > not trusted.) For the purpose of this bug, the test document in Comment1 is correctly signed: - Contains a cryptographically consistant signature - Contains a certificate and chain that match the signature - Contains a date As I've pointed out in Comment33, the original document submitted by Tamas contains none of the above but only a large blob of zeroes where the signature should be. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
