https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93924

Cor Nouws <c...@nouenoff.nl> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEEDINFO
                 CC|                            |c...@nouenoff.nl
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #1 from Cor Nouws <c...@nouenoff.nl> ---
Hi Uwe,

Thanks for describing this .. . behaviour.

(In reply to Uwe Dippel from comment #0)
> Created attachment 118418 [details]
> Basic Impress to add an image, and change the layout: image is rescaled and
> moved

I can confirm that. But see it in 4.4 too.

> When I use a very basic presentation (like the attachment), and I insert an
> image (Insert->Image) and scale it (e.g. to be 8cm x 8cm), that's all fine.
> When I then modify the Layout (clicking a predefined layout, e.g.) that
> image snaps into whichever textbox this layout has. Not only does it snap,
> it also auto-magnifies to fill that text box. 
> Then I tried to modify the size again, and again the textbox goes with it.
> Then I add text into the textbox, and the image is in the way ...

When choosing a lay out with two text boxes above each other, I see that one
allows to add text, and the other 'converts to the image'.

> Whatever. I think someone wanted to follow the mostly stupid 'clever stuff'
> piled up by the main competitor, and ended up at being constantly in the way
> of proper working. 
> 
> No workaround possible, but to remove all images. 

Hmm I can simply resize ..

> I even tried to drag the
> images totally off the slide, on the workbench. And yet, some layout
> modification auto-snaps all images back into the slide, and auto-scales them
> [...]

(to much humbling ;) )

> At least it should be modified in a way that when I have touched an image,
> it is considered to stay in that position and that size; irrespective of
> layout changes.

OK, there is a work around, but indeed, having an option to turn of that
setting makes sense IMO.

Do you have any idea when this functionality was introduced?

Cheers - Cor

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to