https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93924
Uwe Dippel <udip...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #2 from Uwe Dippel <udip...@gmail.com> ---
I wouldn't know (when it came in). I have been on OpenOffice for the last
years, forced by the regression of displaying .svg and .eps. With 5.X the
display of these formats is back, and so am I. ;-)
I haven't explored this bug in detail, but I was of the impression, that the
text boxes scaled around the (again) resized images. Maybe I was too stupid to
do what you did, and then I stand corrected.
If not, the concept would be braindead, yes, braindead, because the layout
boxes are basically boxes for text: title, one box, two columns, 2 columns by 2
rows, etc. *If* one wanted this behaviour to be 'good', a distinction between
text and image boxes ought to be done. *Then* images may well snap to image
boxes, like text size can be set to snap to text box sizes.
But when I decide for 2 columns per slide, this is usually meant as 'two
columns with text and drawings, images; NOT just 2 images by default.
Yes, thanks for agreeing that this does not make sense in many situations. Like
in almost all of mine: my way of working is to drag in an image, size it to fit
to the slide, and then add test, as text box, or - preferably - with layout,
because then the text is all lined up identical in subsequent slides.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
