https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86321
--- Comment #83 from Lars Jødal <l...@rn.dk> ---
(In reply to matthewnote from comment #79)
> Created attachment 166554 [details]
> Compare LO5 modification of Object/content.xml since removed; regression?
>
> Additional xml compare report for Object/content.xml as described previous
> comment. LibreOffice Calc 5 adds a new line for each and every Object
> "try-staggering-first".
So LO 5.x worked ok, which could mean that the original bug was solved but then
some new bug caused a regression with the same or similar behaviour. Likely
some optimization of diagram updating that "optimized" recalculation too much.
I have performed the test from comment #28 with a few 5.x versions, and can
confirm that diagram update DOES work for that file. The regression is present
by 6.0.0.0.beta1, while 6.0.0.0.alpha1 does update the diagram.
First question: Does the test from comment #28 test for "First bug" from
comment #80, or for "Second bug" (now split out as bug 137735)?
Second question: What will constitute a simple test example for the other bug
(whether "first" or "second") not tested for by the procedure in comment #28?
(This thread is becoming quite scary just by its size. While details can reveal
new findings, I think that at the present stage we are more in need of simple
test cases with simple descriptions.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
