https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145734
--- Comment #11 from Michael Weghorn <m.wegh...@posteo.de> --- Thanks for the update, good to hear it's working now. (In reply to Timur from comment #10) > To go back to this issue title, I also don't see libreoffice-qt6 in > OpenSuse, please ask to be added. I'm not using OpenSUSE myself and don't know about the exact processes there. Please feel free to ask there yourself (and let me know in case any additional input should be needed from my side). Please also note the discussion in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1019740 : At this point, qt6 isn't used by default in any desktop environment and it probably won't before desktop environments based on Qt 6 (like Plasma 6) are there, so the qt6 VCL plugin is currently mostly for people who deliberately want to use it, which may or may not be a reason for distros to still wait before packaging it. (Just having qt6 installed won't affect users at all unless they explicitly set SAL_USE_VCLPLUGIN=qt6 to choose to use it.) > IIUC, we need that package to be able to test LO with qt6. Yes. I think the best way to provide the package depends a bit on the actual use case. Distros will typically only provide the latest released LO version, so in case you want to test daily builds, that would need another approach (like having qt6 in TDF builds, or if it's only a limited amount of users I could also upload a build of mine somewhere every once in a while,...). Would be good to know what the exact needs are there right. Since the qt6 VCL plugin shares most of the code with qt5, I'd expect that the two will behave the same for most situations as of now, but any testing is appreciated of course. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
