https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159018
--- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> --- WinGlyphFallbackSubstititution::FindFontSubstitute now finds Symbol. Indeed, it has the same character repertoire as Wingdings; and indeed, it's its glyph which gets shown now. It is curious, if the function's "are the missing characters symbols?" check can be improved - it returns OpenSymbol, which doesn't include the character in question. However ... why would Wingdings be preferred over Symbol in any case? Both are symbol fonts; both have glyphs for the wanted character ... And Symbol is lexicographically first. It seems like with previous hash implementation, Wingdings accidentally came in front of Symbol - but it's just luck. My current idea is: why do we use fallbacks at all? Can we instead use "no glyph" placeholder unconditionally?... Sigh, not realistic, but that would prevent creation of the problem in the first place. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
