Michael Stahl-2 wrote > > imho to > prevent this abuse the priorities should be settable only by experienced > QA or developers, not by everybody. >
Having done such mistakes in the past (still doing?) I couldn't agree more. Michael Stahl-2 wrote > > but what really gets my attention these days is a "regression" keyword. > Excellent :) Regressions are indeed the worst form of getting people unhappy. Getting stuck on something that used to work and doesn't any more is more frustrating that something that never worked :) -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-do-not-update-MAB-without-a-comment-was-Re-Bug-37361-LibreOffice-3-5-most-annoying-bus-tp3919364p3920906.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/