On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 04:54:36PM -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote: > As brought-up by Bjoern during the meeting, it's good for us if we can > identify how many regressions have been introduced during the course > of a (minor) release series of LibreOffice. > > https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/May_3#PENDING_ITEM:_Regressions_within_a_release > > One good way to tackle this problem would be to bibisect any bug > marked as a regression and try to date it to before the X.X.0 point > release. > > Joel - How much work would it be to bibisect the regressions for each > release? Aside from initial triage/repro, what other QA tasks should > take priority over this work?
fyi: I added the relevant queries to the minutes at: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Meetings/2013/April_19#NEW_ITEM:_Regressions_within_a_release_.28Bjoern.29 -- its currently some 60 bugs to check. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
