Hi Björn
Bjoern Michaelsen wrote > Not at all, since the builds themselves are provided by volunteers. Of > course, > you are invited to maintain a tinderbox providing daily builds in a more > reliable fashion (or help out with one of the existing ones). Actually > that > would be most welcome! As you know, I'm not a developer. Getting a tinderbox to work in a "more reliable fashion" requires developer knowledge. I think it would make more sense to invite one the project's developers (I'm sure that out of the hundreds of LO developers there must be some who are not swamped with work and would gladly take this task...) Best regards, Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-ANN-LibreOffice-4-1-2-RC3-test-builds-available-tp4075690p4077036.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
