Hi, On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 01:46:24PM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > I disagree. The libraries are separate projects, not components of a > single project. Also, an user reporting a bug for one of the libraries > might not even know about DLP. So hiding the libraries under DLP label > would not be user friendly.
True from a technical point of view. But being the devils advocate here: Maybe DLP should consider syncing these separate projects and release them as a consistent collection. If anything, LibreOffice (and in a different realm: systemd) has shown this to have significant marketing, branding and release engineering advantages. This really doesnt belong here, its hardly a QA topic. But maybe DLP projects should at least consider the thought. Justsaying. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
