jmadero wrote > I'm not seeing what exactly you're proposing anyone do.
It's simple: have a Bug Squashing Session. Invite all developers. Advertise it like you do with Bug Hunting Sessions Can you (or Robinson, or anyone) please propose this at the ESC? jmadero wrote > Do you want TDF to lock LibreOffice > every other major release and say "absolutely no new features or bug > squashing, only regression fixing?" I think you have a misunderstanding > of the relationship that the Document Foundation (entity) has with it's > contributors (volunteers). I think you didn't read my email. Or maybe it's my English. Obviously the message is not passing through. jmadero wrote > Again, nothing is preventing you from reaching out and trying to recruit > developers to focus on regressions. I can't even convince people on the QA mailing list, how could I possibly "recruit developers"? Never mind. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Reminder-QA-Meeting-on-Wednesday-tp4167253p4167434.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
