Hi Tommy
Tommy wrote > Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+ > Build ID: f64a190f52f9e9c76c2a0d18f072938b5df93aae > CPU Threads: 4; OS Version: Windows 6.29; UI Render: default; > TinderBox: Win-x86@42, Branch:master, Time: 2016-02-28_14:15:03 > Locale: it-IT (it_IT) > > but I think it would be easier to see it after the version number as you > suggested In the example you provided it only shows that the daily is Win x86 (because it's from a Win-x86 labeled Tinderbox). But as Stuart pointed out you already have that information because if the "Version:" information does NOT end with (x64) then it is the 32 bit version (x86) The only bit of information that it is actually missing is the architecture of the OS. But this is only relevant in the case that someone is running the 32bit version in a 64bit OS. It is probably not worth the effort. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/More-information-in-About-dialog-tp4177879p4178265.html Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list Mail address: Libreoffice-qa@lists.freedesktop.org Change settings: https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/
