On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Stefan Knorr (Astron) <heinzless...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you clarify why you think these fonts are not free? Afaik, they > are under the fairly standard, free AL2, or OFL, respectively. The > Ubuntu font otoh uses its own license that unfortunately adds > restrictions on when you can rename it and when you can't. > It removes value from our templates if you can't actually use them as > intended on some of the supported platforms, so the question if the > font can be found in all our main platforms is somewhat important.
Astron, the UFL is as permissive as the OFL and the ALv2. And I don’t think Open Sans, PT Serif and Source are not free, please re-read my previous message, it is Debian who thinks they’re not free, because they were created with proprietary software (read: not created with FontForge). My position on this is to continue shipping Open/PT/Source and add Ubuntu as well. But -- Debian would need to remove our fonts in their package. -- Adolfo _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise