On 24/01/13 21:15, Rene Engelhard wrote: > On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:56:29AM -0600, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote:
>>> Yeah, For that reason it's /supposed to be in) non-free in Debian, see >>> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603157. >>> >>> We shouldn't include non-free stuff here. >> >> Yeah, it’s considered “non-free” by Debian, but we can apply the same >> logic to the other “non-free” fonts added to LibreOffice, such as Open >> Sans, Source {Code|Sans} Pro and PT Serif. But instead of removing > > Err, you want to tell me we already have them in the sources? it appears so, see more_fonts/UnpackedTarball_{opensans,ptserif,sourcecode,sourcesans}.mk but it can be disabled via --without-fonts >> these from shipping in LibreOffice, Debian packaging should be the >> place where these fonts are removed. Because its *Debian policy* which >> should not obstaculize LibreOffice from shipping fonts to Windows. > > Erm, you forgot this is a OSS project (aka "free software" for those who > don't like "free"[1]). So we must not ship them either. hmm... if the problem is "can only be built from source with non-free tools", then i'm afraid we've got a few components in extensions/ that can only be built with MSVC, not with MinGW, and of course the Windows binaries also bundle non-free MSVC runtime. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-ux-advise mailing list Libreoffice-ux-advise@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-ux-advise
