https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=169507
--- Comment #5 from WalterGV <[email protected]> --- Thank you, Heiko, for your input. Perhaps the solution is not to redesign the dialog entirely, but rather to adjust the terminology or the behavior of the two passwords. At the moment, the workflow is inconsistent: If only the open password is set, the document opens normally in edit mode. But if both passwords are set, using the open password opens the file in read‑only mode, and the read‑only password is then required to unlock editing. Trying to open the file directly with the read‑only password fails. This contradicts the naming and can easily confuse users. Keeping the interface as it is but renaming the fields (or swapping their functions) would make the workflow clearer. For example: “Password to open the document” “Optional password to enable editing after opening” This way, users understand that there is only one password to access the file, and the second is an optional restriction, not a second opening password. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
