Present: + Michael, Norbert, Kendy, Andras, Bjoern, Thorsten, Petr, Fridrich, Cedric, Kohei, Rene, Mitch
* AA done: + encourage(d) QA guys to quietly dig at snapshots + master now parallel installable (thanks Andras) + to get a release build: --enable-release + improved Easy Hacks wiki pages (Bjoern) + UNO / ABI breaking changes into a set of wiki page for 4.0 (Bjoern + Kohei) * AA still pending: + research when gio came into widespread being (Caolan) cf. http://www.gtk.org/download-linux.html + wiki's impress 3.4 feature list (Thorsten) + the rdb setup stuff is still too cumbersome (Bjoern) + get SmartArt into master as an experimental feature (Thorsten) + announce new 4.0 wiki page (Bjoern) + write list of things that suck for newcomers with taste (Mitch / Christian) * 3.4 status ... (Petr / Fridrich) + good progress fixing bugs + much more testing going on + many people seem unaware that we are using a time based release schedule AA: + write up the rational for that (Michael) * confusion wrt. 'most annoying bugs' tracker bug (Petr) + is it for long standing / annoying bugs ? or for blockers ? + instead: it should list all bugs we would like to fix in 3.4.x releases AA: + move all 'feature' bugs to new "most annoying for 3.5" bug (Petr) AA: + Petr to decide and come up with a static link of key bugs (Petr) * announcing binfilter as deprecated in 3.4 + want to warn people in plenty of time + officially deprecate it, we drop save support in 3.4 + be warned - it will die in a new major release soon. * reviewboard / etc. (Bjoern) + would using it make things easier for new developers ? + another authentication account required + help tracking the patch pipeline, and its status + problems with off-line use + is a separate patches mailing list good ? + no - best to have a big friendly noise (Kendy) + happy for an additional tool though (kendy) + reviewing patches in bugs can be good (Mitch) + but many patches get lost ~forever without poking (Michael) + one mailing list best, but interested in reviewboard (Norbert) + script could generate reviewboard tasks from ML (Bjoern) AA: + Bjoern to investigate and come back with a more concrete proposal * ESC membership discussion * single git repo test (Norbert) + performance is workable, merging less of an issue + next step to setup a test repo + necessary for tinderboxes / git bisect AA: + come up with a concrete plan (Norbert, Kendy) + first-cut - just merge the repos: preserves history + makes history odd, but preserves ownership nicely + do we migrate 3.3 / 3.4 ? (probably not) + new repo names needed. + plan to pull trigger mid 3.5 devel. cycle. * 3.5 release ... + nudging closer to distribution cycles / alignment ? + when should we go for maximum effect ? + with less table point-zero releases, distros will use other versions + if point zero releases are less stable, distros will use other versions + should the office suite be in sync. with the desktop ? AA: + generate a preferred date for a .2 release (Petr, Bjoern, Caolan) + we review these; and build a six monthly schedule around it -- michael.me...@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice