On Fri, 2011-05-13 at 22:38 +0200, Chr. Rossmanith wrote: > Quick answer :-) Thank you! > >> at the moment I'm having a look at ExcelToSc and ExcelToSc8 and have the > >> feeling that there is some amount of duplicate code... > >> > >> During comparison of methods ExcRelToScRel and ExcRelToScRel8 I've > >> wondered if it shouldn't be nRow instead of nC in the initialisation of > >> bRowRel: > > No, that code is correct. In the Excel binary format, both column and > > row flags are stored in the (unused) higher bits of the column index > > bytes. > > > And it changed with versions?
That's possible. BIFF5 and BIFF8 handle many things differently. I'm just talking about BIFF8 here. I don't even know if we can still find a spec on BIFF5. But then, that format is so old we don't really pay that much attention. But if something as basic as that (cell address) is wrong, I would think that we would have received lots of bugs reports regarding Excel import filter bugs. So I assume that's correct. Kohei -- Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc <kyosh...@novell.com> _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
