Hi Albert,
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 23:07 +0100, Albert Thuswaldner wrote:
> There has been some interesting discussions here on the mailinglist
> about static analyzer tools, unused includes and the impact of the
This looks like some interesting research :-)
> Anyway, I have not analyzed the results myself in detail but it is a
> shame it only detects unused includes in header files.
Well - the pre-compiled headers would make -tons- of includes look
useless anyway, though (I thought) we had decided to get rid of them as
an under-maintained and bad job anyway ;-)
Have you tried acting on this lot:
Looking for useless includes in header files...
AccessibleCell.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
AccessibleCellBase.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
AccessiblePreviewHeaderCell.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
AccessibleTableBase.hxx --> global.hxx (useless)
...
And turning it into some patches to remove those headers & seeing if it
compiles nicely ? if so it'd be nice to include that no doubt.
Thanks !
Michael.
--
[email protected] <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
