Hi Stephan and Michael, On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:03, Stephan Bergmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Nice approach. :) One remark re "Looking for .cxx files whose first > include is not the header file...": I did not look into the articles you > cite to see whether or why they advocate to include the corresponding header > first in the .cxx file
According to the article that is the "most important guideline" taken from this book: Large Scale C++ Software Design by John Lakos http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0201633620 Makes one curious doesn't it? See if one can get hold of that book, seems applicable for LO development. On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 19:12, Michael Meeks <[email protected]> wrote: > > Well - the pre-compiled headers would make -tons- of includes look > useless anyway, though (I thought) we had decided to get rid of them as > an under-maintained and bad job anyway ;-) > > Have you tried acting on this lot: > > Looking for useless includes in header files... > AccessibleCell.hxx --> global.hxx (useless) > AccessibleCellBase.hxx --> global.hxx (useless) > AccessiblePreviewHeaderCell.hxx --> global.hxx (useless) > AccessibleTableBase.hxx --> global.hxx (useless) > ... > > And turning it into some patches to remove those headers & seeing if it > compiles nicely ? if so it'd be nice to include that no doubt. > Sure, I can do that, I'll give it a spin and see if it pops... /Albert _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
