Hi Tommy,
On Sat, 2012-03-24 at 14:41 +0100, Tommy wrote:
> well, I can try to re-test the open "3.4.x MAB" on 3.5.1 to see which one
> could be considered FIXED and which one are still affecting the 3.5.x
> family so they could be moved to "3.5.x MAB" page.
Cool - that sounds like something well worth doing.
> for example this bug: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39006
> is still reproducible in 3.5.1 (see my report) so could be added to "3.5.x
> MAB"
Sounds good to me, and I love the MAB acronym :-) this one sounds like
it has a fix we could cherry-pick to 3-5 too, so good to get more
visibility there.
> I did not add it yet because I want official permission to do that.
> I'd also leave that bug on the "3.4.x MAB" page just for historical
> reference.
Sure - I'd feel much happier if I could read the minutes from the
Friday QA call and what was decided there, I don't want to get that
confused.
> probably Reiner anf the guys from QA could add a message at the bottom of
> the 3.4.x MAB page telling user that 3.4.x will be no longer developed
> so any further bug nomination should be done in the 3.5.x MAB page
Yep - sounds most sensible; I suppose closing that bug is hard if some
of it's dependencies are still open for 3.5 ;-) and it's useful to keep
it open for historical interest reasons.
Thanks !
Michael.
--
michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
