On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 11:40:13AM +0300, Tor Lillqvist wrote: > > This is a good idea, but I think it would be even better to have > > autogen.lastrun.build (or whatever you want to call it). Then we would > > not need to specify _any_ build-specific options for the host configure. > > Opinions? > > I don't think that would be easy to implement,
Why not? Changing the inner configure call to ./configure `cat configure.lastrun.build` seems pretty simple (of course there should be check if the file exists etc.) Or am I missing something? > and in any case, then > we should rename autogen.lastrun to configure.lastun (possibly then > suffixed with .host and .build) to avoid confusion. After all, > autogen.sh is not run twice in a cross-compiling configuration; > configure is. Yes, that would make sense. I just used the terminology we have now (and I added "or whatever you want to call it"). D. _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
