> Why not? Changing the inner configure call to > > ./configure `cat configure.lastrun.build`
Sure, but then there would be a discrepancy with how autogen.lastrun works. Or should we realize already that autogen.lastrun isn't actually valued by developers as a "backup copy" of their last autogen.sh parameters, but it is seen as a precious input file, edited and certainly not intended to get over-written... and remove the code to (re)write it from autogen.sh? Anyway, I am not opposed to this idea. I would perhaps call it configure.args.build (and configure.args.host, if we remove the "backup copy" aspect)? --tml _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
