Glad you like it. Yes, a permanent regular solution is a good idea, but i have no idea onhow to intergrate it in your current solution.
On 8/3/12, Michael Meeks <michael.me...@suse.com> wrote: > Hi John, > > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 09:00 +0200, John Smith wrote: >> Thanks for all the help and tips everyone provided. I finally have >> successfully run the clang analyzer on LibreOffice ~master with >> '--with-system-libs'. The only exceptions being: > > Great :-) > >> I have uploaded the generated report here: >> http://lbalbalba.x90x.net/clang-analyzer/libreoffice-with-system-libs/ > > And we updated the easy-hack bug to point there too IIRC :-) > >> PS2: I would have loved to mention the exact revision of 'master' I >> ran this test on, but Im really new to git. Is there a git command >> that can provide a human readable/meaningful revision number, like you >> can get with 'svn info' ? > > There are lots of ways, this works: > > git log | head -n1 > > And requires little mental space to remember ;-) > > I guess we'd want to do that build regularly; perhaps doing some > tweaking to make it part of Lubos' clang / tinderbox build might be a > good long-term solution ? > > Thanks ! > > Michael. > > -- > michael.me...@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot > > _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
