On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 11:19:53AM -0500, Kohei Yoshida wrote: > Yet, it's the core developers who will likely be called in to answer > "hey my build failed with this python test, tell me what's wrong!!!"
In subsequentcheck? If that should indeed be the case even then, we can make a separate "make pythoncheck" target. > Now you are the one being academic here. Stick to the topic please, > which is whether or not Python tests should be used to test core > functionality. Nobody is talking about boost here. I am talking about testing the _product_ here. > But to answer that question, if we discover a bug in boost, that should > be fixed and tested in the boost project. Not us. A bug in boost is a bug in LibreOffice. At least on Windows, but for TDF builds also elsewhere. And a test that finds a bug is still a good test, even if it wasnt written for that. Best, Bjoern _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice