On Wed, 2014-02-19 at 11:42 -0500, Kevin Hunter Kesling wrote: > I'm sorry to have ignited a discussion for which I wasn't looking. I > clearly don't have the authority to weigh in given my (lack of) > meritocratic wealth in the LibO community, so let me keep this simple: > I'm truly just trying to find an agreeable avenue for hacking on LibO > given my use cases and time.
Hi Kevin, Just to be clear, I do see PyUNO as a very important part of LibreOffice as the product, which can potentially be a major selling point over MS Office which still uses Visual Basic as the main macro language. And I do see that it's a shame that we don't have enough documentation coverage on PyUNO, and I'm all for increasing the stability of PyUNO. I was just trying to point out some of the mis-understandings surrounding the test framework and some practical view points from those of us who are in the front line. But then the discussion has blown out of proportion and we are now basically discussing the origin of the universe... So, please don't feel bad about this. Hopefully what Stephan has proposed is a good starting point for you? There are places for Python tests, which nobody is disputing. Kohei _______________________________________________ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice