On Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:21:02 -0400, André Silva wrote: > On 06/12/2016 06:43 PM, fauno wrote: > > Florencia Diaz <flodia...@riseup.net> writes: > >> We are deciding by consensus that is good call it "Arch (the GNU/Linux > >> distribution)", not "Arch Linux". Even Richard Stallman is agree about > >> it, please no more fighting between us, we are part from the same > >> distribution and community. > > > > +1 to the latest version [0] with arch called "arch (the gnu/linux > > distribution)" which everyone seems to agree with > > > > > > [0]: > > https://projects.parabola.nu/~lukeshu/social-contract.git/tree/Parabola_Social_Contract.md?h=proposals/lukeshu&id=89181428abb804ec94ed17b8732ff71540b01bdb > > +1
Fine. https://projects.parabola.nu/~lukeshu/social-contract.git/tree/Parabola_Social_Contract.md?h=proposals/lukeshu&id=1e4484a83d30ecbfa8592b336a7de27028425bcf I put just "Arch" in the heading (because otherwise the heading was just way too long, IMO) and "Arch (the GNU/Linux distrubtion)" in the body. I'm fine with this version passing. Possible other changes: - The "democratic" thing. - I'm actually not super happy with the way I worded the Free Culture item. The tone is different than the rest of the document. -- Happy hacking, ~ Luke Shumaker
