On 04/16/2017 08:32 PM, Michael Pagan wrote: > the work must be under the same license as the original work, too.
To be picky and pedantic, what matters for copyleft is merely that the freedoms may not be stripped away. It doesn't matter whether derivatives have the exact same license, that's just the normal mechanism for copyleft. GPLv3 code allows use in AGPLv3 and that's not strictly the same license. If it is ever released, copyleft-next might be a license that retains copyleft by specifying derivatives to use either the same *or* AGPL… What defines copyleft is that stripping away freedoms is itself copyright violation. Any mechanism achieving that result is copyleft.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss