[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]] [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]] [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> I agree that this is a problem, but as presented FSF doesn't enable us > to use other terms as it's too software-oriented so this is the best we > can do even when the hardware is released under GPLv3. I don't believe that is true. I suspect that the term "open source hardware" is incoherent. If the board circuit is published under a free license, but the chip designes are not, is that hardware "open source"? If so, the term is so weak that using it is not helpful. I suggest the term "free-design hardware" to mean hardware made from free designs. -- Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org) Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org) Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org) Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org) _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
