* Jacob Hrbek <krey...@rixotstudio.cz> [2022-01-31 17:52]: > I agree that this is a problem, but as presented FSF doesn't enable us > to use other terms as it's too software-oriented so this is the best we > can do even when the hardware is released under GPLv3.
I cannot see how FSF doesn't enable you to use any terms you wish and want. Purpose of FSF is distributing free software, campaigning for it. How is that disabling you to use any kind of language or terms in your life or your activities? And I cannot see how is hardware related to GPLv3, as it is software license related to copyrights. Now you say it is related to hardware. When RMS designed GPL he was not alone in writing those texts. It requires serious legal qualifications, skills and experience. To design a long lasting copyright license for software requires bunch of efforts. What I suggest to you is that you start re-defining, defining, re-thinking and fixing very good all the legal issues by using legal assistance, attorneys, advisors, various assistants or foundations and organizations which support the cause. Right now, it seem like you are confused, not me. You speak of free software license that should relate to hardware. But it is not meant for hardware. I do understand what you want with the hardware, but you should not mix the terms. -- Jean Take action in Free Software Foundation campaigns: https://www.fsf.org/campaigns In support of Richard M. Stallman https://stallmansupport.org/ _______________________________________________ libreplanet-discuss mailing list libreplanet-discuss@libreplanet.org https://lists.libreplanet.org/mailman/listinfo/libreplanet-discuss
