On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:34:12PM +0300, Paul Sokolovsky wrote: >Mandatory data imports marking: I *hate* this feature and develop >libtool re-implementation which frees programmer from it. But when I >mentioned it on cygwin maillist, DJ Delorie was rather sceptical about >it, saying they will support MS way. Do you have a URL for this skepticism? I hate marking data imports also. It would be interesting to see what DJ's reasons are. I've never known him to be resistant to good ideas. Anyway, it would be interesting to see how you work around this. I can't think of any way to handle this without changing the compiler and the linker. cgf
- Re: DLL naming conventions Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: DLL naming conventions Alexandre Oliva
- Re: DLL naming conventions Gary V. Vaughan
- RE: DLL naming conventions Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: DLL naming conventions David A. Cobb
- Re[4]: DLL naming conventions Paul Sokolovsky
- Re: Re[4]: DLL naming conventions Gary V. Vaughan
- Re: Re[4]: DLL naming conventions Alexandre Oliva
- Re[2]: DLL naming conventions Paul Sokolovsky
- Re[2]: DLL naming conventions Paul Sokolovsky
- Re: DLL naming conventions Chris Faylor
- Re: DLL naming conventions DJ Delorie
- Re[2]: DLL naming conventions Paul Sokolovsky
- RE: Re[2]: DLL naming conventions Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re[4]: DLL naming conventions Paul Sokolovsky
- Re: Re[2]: DLL naming conventions Alexandre Oliva
- Re[4]: DLL naming conventions Paul Sokolovsky
- Re: Re[4]: DLL naming conventions Alexandre Oliva