On Tuesday 17 April 2001 4:25 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
> >
> > > - When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still
> > > create a lib<name>.a. However, it is an actual archive containing the
> > > shared object (just like the quirky way the rest of AIX does it).
> > > What you end up with is a libltdl.a that contains both the shared and
> > > the non-shared object. This is not really what was intended, and would
> > > likely cause problems if you ever really needed to use the non-shared
> > > object, but for the most part it seems to work. The only other thing I
> > > can think to do is not bulid the non-shared object in this case.
> >
> > Is this the best approach? (I am not arguing that it isn't... I just
> > want you to reassure me that having distinct linktime vs. runtime library
> > names is more broken on AIX than what you have in your current patch).
>
> Hi Gary,
>
> Could you explain this a little more, I'm not sure I understand what you
> are asking?
>
> Dan
Hi Dan!
Sorry. I meant to say that this seems really screwy, and were you sure that
having a separate static and shared lib would be even worse? However, Russ
and Alexandre have already persuaded me that your approach is correct, so no
need to answer =)O|
Cheers,
Gary.
--
___ _ ___ __ _ mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _ _ __ _| |_ __ _ ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
\___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page: /___/ /___/ gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool