> From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 16 20:49:52 2001
>
> > - When building libtool without run-time-linking, my changes do still
> > create a lib<name>.a. However, it is an actual archive containing the
> > shared object (just like the quirky way the rest of AIX does it).
> > What you end up with is a libltdl.a that contains both the shared and the
> > non-shared object. This is not really what was intended, and would
> > likely cause problems if you ever really needed to use the non-shared
> > object, but for the most part it seems to work. The only other thing I can
> > think to do is not bulid the non-shared object in this case.
>
> Is this the best approach? (I am not arguing that it isn't... I just want
> you to reassure me that having distinct linktime vs. runtime library names is
> more broken on AIX than what you have in your current patch).
>
Hi Gary,
Could you explain this a little more, I'm not sure I understand what you
are asking?
Dan
_______________________________________________
Libtool mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
