Well, I do realize that it's non-portable, but the number of platforms I'm building on is very restricted (the application is only of any real use on Linux systems running RPM, dpkg, and a few other special cases). I'm not really intentionally trying to use libtool; I'm just using automake, which told me to pass linker directives in the prog_LDADD variable, which I did, until it broke, and it seems that libtool 1.4 is what changes this behaviour.
I'm not sure why it's using libtool to link my program -- is this necessary, avoidable? Ian On Sat, 2001-10-06 at 17:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Ian Peters writes: > > > Yes, the end goal is to have all of the libraries between the -Bstatic > > and -Bdynamic linked statically, while keeping a dynamic binary against > > libc and ld-linux. > > You do realize that this goal cannot be portably accomplished, so you > perhaps shouldn't use libtool? > > -- > Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://funkturm.homeip.net/~peter > _______________________________________________ Libtool mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
