Hi Alon, On 22 May 2010, at 13:02, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Gary V. Vaughan <g...@gnu.org> wrote: >> >> GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a >> consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, >> which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries >> (modules) behind a consistent, portable interface. > > <snip> > > I don't think [1] was solved. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/libtool@gnu.org/msg12013.html
Thanks for the ping. However I haven't used a Windows machine in almost a decade and don't have access to one, but I'd be happy to accept a patch. Although I've slipped the deadlines I set myself at the top of this thread: http://www.mail-archive.com/libtool@gnu.org/msg12059.html a little already, I still plan to put Libtool-2.2.8 out within a week (or two at most), just so long as no one reports significant breakage or regression that make it worse than 2.2.6. And then Libtool-2.2.10 a month (or two at most) later. If your pet bugs aren't patched in time for 2.2.8, there's still time to feed a patch to us in time for 2.2.10. Cheers, -- Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org) _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
