On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Gary V. Vaughan <g...@gnu.org> wrote: > Hi Alon, > > On 22 May 2010, at 13:02, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: >> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Gary V. Vaughan <g...@gnu.org> wrote: >>> >>> GNU Libtool hides the complexity of using shared libraries behind a >>> consistent, portable interface. GNU Libtool ships with GNU libltdl, >>> which hides the complexity of loading dynamic runtime libraries >>> (modules) behind a consistent, portable interface. >> >> <snip> >> >> I don't think [1] was solved. >> >> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/libtool@gnu.org/msg12013.html > > Thanks for the ping. However I haven't used a Windows machine in almost > a decade and don't have access to one, but I'd be happy to accept a patch.
You don't have to access one, as this is exactly what I am trying to achieve, cross compile Windows binaries on Linux. > Although I've slipped the deadlines I set myself at the top of this thread: > http://www.mail-archive.com/libtool@gnu.org/msg12059.html a little already, > I still plan to put Libtool-2.2.8 out within a week (or two at most), just > so long as no one reports significant breakage or regression that make it > worse than 2.2.6. > > And then Libtool-2.2.10 a month (or two at most) later. > > If your pet bugs aren't patched in time for 2.2.8, there's still time to > feed a patch to us in time for 2.2.10. > > Cheers, > -- > Gary V. Vaughan (g...@gnu.org) > If I read your response correctly, all is needed is to set: lt_cv_deplibs_check_method="pass_all" For mingw hosts. But I am no expert in libtool, and it is a complex set of macros. All I know that in the final result libtool script setting: deplibs_check_method="pass_all" Makes it work. If you have some other though and you want me to test, I will be happy to. Regards, Alon. _______________________________________________ http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool
