On Fri 2012-Apr-20 13:54 PM Xiaofan Chen wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Lei Chen<raymond.c...@oracle.com>  wrote:
>> Hi Pete,
>>      I haven't followed closely on this list. Why do you abandon libusb and
>> fork another project doing the same thing? There's no maintenance on libusb
>> 1.0?
> Because there have not been a formal release for a long time since 1.0.8
> was released on 04-May-2010. Please read Pete's post.
> http://libusb.6.n5.nabble.com/libusb-is-dead-long-live-libusbx-td5651413.html
>
> BTW, OpenUSB is kind of dead as well even though Michael Lewis is still
> coming out of release. Are you interested to get a port of libusb/libusbx to
> Solaris/OpenSolaris (but OpenSolaris is also kind of dead)? You can
> probably reuse quite some OpenUSB codes.
I haven't got a strong requirement on libusb 1.0.x. Do you know if there's any 
application that must use the libusb 1.0 API?

BTW, OpenUSB works well on Solaris.

Thanks,
Lei Chen


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
libusbx-devel mailing list
libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel

Reply via email to