On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > I'm pretty sure the first thing we'll need to do, if we apply this > patch, is remove it in the hotplug/2.0 branch, so I'm a bit on the fence > as to whether it should be applied. > > Given the choice, I'd rather work on kickstarting the libusbx 2.0 branch > and apply the hp patches I have in -pbatard, but it may take a while... >
I agree with you here. It is better to leave this out and only solve this problem in the hotplug branch slated for 2.0. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
