Pete Batard wrote: > If you think there ever was a problem, Maybe Ludovic's point is that it would be nice to track authorship in more detail than you care to.
> then Peter successfully managed to make you believe that he had a > say as to the content of the patch or the commit message I wrote many times that the point is about authorship, not about commit content or description of commit content. One easy way to add "small" authorship information is a line in the commit message. > people would have first added this patch to their tree and tested If you want to go with what I think Ludovic suggested then you would send the two patches only when they were both finished. No point in something that will be changed right after, as you wrote regarding the device filtering. > I think there's a threshold for which addons should be split into a > separate commits I agree. Below the threshold I think a note in the commit message is a good idea; a reasonable tradeoff between effort and benefit. //Peter ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
