On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 11:19 PM, Pete Batard <p...@akeo.ie> wrote: > On 2012.05.15 01:03, Pete Batard wrote: >> Could be that we're >> trying to access unref'd and restroyed parent devices on OS-X, hence the >> seemingly random outcome. > > Yup. Confirmed that some of the parents we're trying to access get > unref'd and destroyed before we attempt to access their data. If you're > lucky, the data hasn't been realloced and is still valid. If not, > segfault... > > Obviously I'd prefer if Nathan was the one to address this issue, as he > may have more insight as to the best way to do so.
I have not checked if Nathan is in the list or not, seems not since I have not seen his post here. -- Xiaofan ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
