On 2012.05.25 11:46, g...@novadsp.com wrote: >> Sure, and there is an implementation, but the implementation needed >> further work before being added into the Windows backend and the >> author didn't work with Pete on that.
Note that the code pointed out by Peter is _NOT_ the one that is going to be used by libusbx. The reasons are: 1. It is too old (more than 2 years) and hasn't been updated at all 2. It doesn't support libusbK, only libusb0 3. The author didn't address some shortcomings and indicated that he wouldn't support his code 4. We have had a better (simpler) informal patch, with libusb0 and libusbK, which is what we plan to use for libusbx. > Is there a plan for code signing? The libusb0 and libusbK drivers are signed and work fine on x64. Regards, /Pete ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ libusbx-devel mailing list libusbx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/libusbx-devel
